Online Proctoring Statistics


Steve Goldstein
Steve Goldstein
Business Formation Expert
Steve Goldstein runs LLCBuddy, helping entrepreneurs set up their LLCs easily. He offers clear guides, articles, and FAQs to simplify the process. His team keeps everything accurate and current, focusing on state rules, registered agents, and compliance. Steve’s passion for helping businesses grow makes LLCBuddy a go-to resource for starting and managing an LLC.

All Posts by Steve Goldstein →
Business Formation Expert  |   Fact Checked by Editorial Staff
Last updated: 
LLCBuddy™ offers informative content for educational purposes only, not as a substitute for professional legal or tax advice. We may earn commissions if you use the services we recommend on this site.
At LLCBuddy, we don't just offer information; we provide a curated experience backed by extensive research and expertise. Led by Steve Goldstein, a seasoned expert in the LLC formation sector, our platform is built on years of hands-on experience and a deep understanding of the nuances involved in establishing and running an LLC. We've navigated the intricacies of the industry, sifted through the complexities, and packaged our knowledge into a comprehensive, user-friendly guide. Our commitment is to empower you with reliable, up-to-date, and actionable insights, ensuring you make informed decisions. With LLCBuddy, you're not just getting a tutorial; you're gaining a trustworthy partner for your entrepreneurial journey.

Online Proctoring Statistics 2023: Facts about Online Proctoring outlines the context of what’s happening in the tech world.

LLCBuddy editorial team did hours of research, collected all important statistics on Online Proctoring, and shared those on this page. Our editorial team proofread these to make the data as accurate as possible. We believe you don’t need to check any other resources on the web for the same. You should get everything here only 🙂

Are you planning to form an LLC? Maybe for educational purposes, business research, or personal curiosity, whatever the reason is – it’s always a good idea to gather more information about tech topics like this.

How much of an impact will Online Proctoring Statistics have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your LLC Business? How much does it matter directly or indirectly? You should get answers to all your questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any words.

Top Online Proctoring Statistics 2023

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 15 Online Proctoring Statistics on this page 🙂

Online Proctoring “Latest” Statistics

  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[1]
  • According to a survey done in May by the publishing and digital education company Wiley, 93% of instructors believe that students are more inclined to cheat online than in person.[1]
  • One of the organizations that offer that service, ProctorU, detected people cheating on less than 1% of the 340,000 examinations it gave from January through March until Covid-19 forcibly forced millions of students online.[2]
  • When demand spiked and Examity’s 1,000 proctors in India were locked down to stop the coronavirus from spreading there, the company temporarily halted its live proctoring services.[2]
  • For using “tutor-provided solutions” to exam problems from Chegg, more than 200 of the 800 students in a single Statistics 311 class at North Carolina State were recommended for disciplinary action, according to Tyler Johnson, the course coordinator.[2]
  • According to a 2011 research by Ambient Insight Research, 10.65 million students in higher education attended some of their courses online at the time, while 1.25 million students completed all of their courses online (Adkins, 2011).[3]
  • Proctor usage has increased by up to 500% in companies, and there are growing valid worries about their intrusiveness, potential bias, and efficacy.[4]
  • Concerns about online proctors prompted a U.S. Proctorio, ProctorU, and ExamSoft, three of the main proctoring companies that have together presided over at least 30 million exams during the pandemic, were asked for more information in a letter of inquiry from the Senate.[4]
  • Many students taking online courses now take tens of thousands of online exams each month, including an increasing number of students taking face-to-face classes (30,000 exams at Western Governors University alone).[5]
  • According to industry insiders, there are now at least 15 online proctoring companies, more than twice as many as there were just five years ago.[5]
  • Between 30,000 and 40,000 tests are proctored online each year at the 17 campuses of UNC.[5]
  • Over 12,000 tests are proctored online each month at NOVA, where 23,000 students enroll in online courses.[5]
  • The 6,000 full-time students at CSU Channel Islands take 5 to 7 percent of their classes online, but all of their tests are proctored in person, according to Leafstedt.[5]
  • 26 percent of the universities reported using online proctoring services that didn’t adhere to their accessibility guidelines.[6]

Also Read

How Useful is Online Proctoring

One of the key arguments in favor of online proctoring is its ability to detect and deter cheating during exams. Proctoring software can track a student’s eye movements, keystrokes, and browser activity to flag any suspicious behavior. This level of monitoring can potentially discourage students from resorting to dishonest practices during exams, thereby upholding the credibility of the assessment process.

Furthermore, online proctoring eliminates the need for physical invigilators and testing centers, making it a more convenient and cost-effective option for both institutions and students. With the flexibility of scheduling exams at any time and from any location, online proctoring offers a lot of freedom to learners who may have personal or professional commitments that prevent them from being present at a designated testing site.

Moreover, the use of proctoring software can provide valuable data and insights into student performance and test-taking behaviors. Analyzing these metrics can help educators identify areas of improvement in their teaching methods and assessment strategies, leading to more personalized instruction and better student outcomes in the long run.

However, despite its potential benefits, online proctoring also comes with its fair share of drawbacks and limitations. One of the main criticisms of this technology is its invasiveness and violation of student privacy. Constant surveillance during exams can be intimidating and stressful for test-takers, leading to a negative impact on their performance and mental well-being. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the accuracy and reliability of proctoring software in correctly identifying cheating behavior, as false positives can unfairly penalize students who are not actually engaging in dishonest practices.

Furthermore, the use of online proctoring may contribute to a culture of mistrust and surveillance in the academic environment, undermining the principles of autonomy and respect between educators and learners. Students should be able to demonstrate their knowledge and skills based on their own merit and efforts, rather than being subjected to constant scrutiny and suspicion during high-stakes exams.

In conclusion, while online proctoring has its advantages in preventing cheating and enhancing the efficiency of assessments, it is essential to strike a balance between maintaining academic integrity and respecting student privacy and autonomy. Institutions should carefully consider the ethical implications and potential drawbacks of using proctoring software before implementing it on a large scale. Ultimately, the effectiveness of online proctoring depends on how it is implemented and integrated into the broader framework of teaching and learning practices in the digital age.

Reference

  1. educause – https://er.educause.edu/articles/2021/2/proctoring-software-in-higher-ed-prevalence-and-patterns
  2. hechingerreport – https://hechingerreport.org/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-cheating/
  3. umn – https://open.lib.umn.edu/innovativeteaching/chapter/under-the-watchful-eye-of-online-proctoring/
  4. eff – https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/06/long-overdue-reckoning-online-proctoring-companies-may-finally-be-here
  5. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/05/10/online-exam-proctoring-catches-cheaters-raises-concerns
  6. insidehighered – https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/05/11/online-proctoring-surging-during-covid-19

Leave a Comment